GitZoid vs Cursor Bugbot
Your coding agents push more commits every month. Only one of these bills goes up with them.
First 10 outputs free. No card required.
The differences that change the decision.
Price
GitZoid
$19/mo flat. Whole team, up to 50 repos.
Cursor Bugbot
Usage-based since June 2026. Staff-stated $1 to $1.50 per run, no published rate card. Was $40 per seat.
When the meter runs out
GitZoid
No meter. Every PR reviewed, always.
Cursor Bugbot
No stop. Runs on every PR update by default, and users report 7 to 10 runs per PR.
Coverage
GitZoid
GitHub-native. Review in PR comments, security and digest by email.
Cursor Bugbot
GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, including self-hosted. Needs a Cursor account.
Weekly digest
GitZoid
Included. One plain-English email a week.
Cursor Bugbot
None. Output lives in the PR and Cursor dashboard.
Pick based on how you want review to run.
Choose GitZoid
When you want every pull request reviewed for one predictable price, with security monitoring and a weekly digest included.
Choose Bugbot
If you already pay for Cursor, Bugbot is one toggle away, and it covers GitLab, Bitbucket, and self-hosted, which GitZoid does not. GitZoid is for teams whose agents keep pushing commits, where a per-run meter becomes the fastest-growing line on the bill.
Per run adds up. Flat doesn't.
A run fires on every push
Staff confirm $1 to $1.50 per run, and by default a run triggers on every PR update. Five commits, five charges.
Twenty PRs, $150 to $200+
Cursor's own users project 7 to 10 runs per PR, and $150 to $200+ a month on top of the subscription.
Put a patrol on every repo.
Connect a repo and the first review posts on your next pull request. No new tool to learn. GitZoid works inside GitHub.